Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
No, not at all. What puzzles me is how you can support the change for player safety when:
a) Big hits are a much bigger problem
b) Those players make their living off that part of the game, it is not like they are forced to fight. It is an adult choice.
Would you support the end of big hits if that discussion came up in the NHL for player safety reasons? I am curious.
|
A) there are suspensions for most of those hits, and I don't know that they're more dangerous
B) if that's the reason to resist the change, why not allow gladiator style combat if the combatants are willing? If we should enforce safety changes if the employees want it, why aren't the safety inspectors we send to job sites more popular?