Thread: Nutrition
View Single Post
Old 10-02-2013, 08:10 AM   #2
onetwo_threefour
Powerplay Quarterback
 
onetwo_threefour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mahogany, aka halfway to Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Not any kind of expert here, and while I am normally anti-conspiracy theory and respect educated expert opinion, in this case I'd side with the PT. Anecdotally, eliminating starchy carbs (combined with lots of exercise) was my key to losing weight. I went from the perspective of glycolic index and foods that didn't spike blood sugar and cravings.

As soon as your dietician says that doctors only have to take one course about nutrition, you've got to start questioning her objectivity. Doctors have to understand a lot more than just nutrition including basic biology and chemistry.

I have heard similar things about lobbying influencing the food guide and there may be something to it, but my own take comes from my own research and experience. I think the food guide is probably fine for those who aren't sensitive to blood sugar fluctuations AND who work at physically intensive occupations, but for those of us that sit at a desk, have a lot of stress, and may be more sensitive to glucose variations, the food guide is just not appropriate.
__________________
onetwo and threefour... Together no more. The end of an era. Let's rebuild...

Last edited by onetwo_threefour; 10-02-2013 at 08:13 AM. Reason: Correction
onetwo_threefour is offline   Reply With Quote