Quote:
Originally Posted by strombad
Bit of a hypocritical statement, considering your struggles to write one yourself.
The fact of the matter is that Kessel could have seriously injured Scott. Notice how that sentence seems familiar? You might say "but how could he by swinging his stick at his ankles!", but I'll just ask "how could Scott without throwing a single punch". You're assuming based on something that never happened. Kessel could have hit Scott in the head and killed him. I mean, it didn't happen, so we'll never know, but it's roughly as likely as Scott getting his hands on Kessel and punching him to death. Until you admit that Kessel was equally in the wrong here instead of defending him from someone who didn't physically harm him in any way, then your credibility is zero. Please, if you can go a whole few posts without calling people names I suggest you do so, "stupid" and "moronic" are petty, and weaken your argument substantially.
|
Yep, really struggling, good thing I have you here to help.
The whole building could have collapsed and killed everyone, it didn't happen, but it could have. Do you want to keep down this silly path?
The fact of the matter is that I see Kessel's initial slash as justified self defense, which interestingly enough was the same sentiment expressed by Shanahan.
Oh, and that comparison was moronic I'm sorry. Equating something like this to spousal abuse is rather disgusting.