Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Of course...why would I not?Sorry to rain on your parade of condecension.I have little doubt that man has contributed to some degree. What degeree is pretty important though when deciding to implement changes that could quite literally, affect millions of peoples ability to make a living/support their families. Not sure why that wouldn't be just as important facet of this debate as anything else.
Again, and this is where i have no idea, the earth has for its entire existance warmed and cooled. Undeniable fact. It has done so just in my lifetime as a matter of fact. So to what degree do we "tip the apple cart" chasing down a solutiuon that will never work to the degree we wish because of the cycle of warming/cooling the planet has always experienced?
There are valid points on both sides of this thing...and extremists as well, which are illustrated in this very thread alone.
|
It's odd you say we don't know what proportion of the problem is due to man's impact. The scientific community has been predicting exactly that for years - that's what this whole debate is about.