Trusting anything written by the general media on any kind of science is difficult enough, let alone on climate change, let alone The Daily Mail, let alone David Rose. (EDIT: And by trust I mean trusting that it is an accurate representation of the science, not that it is intentionally misleading, though that happens, I bet this is one case).
The Bad Astronomer does a good job of pointing out why this is just picking things out to find a supposed conflict where none exists and how he misquotes people to try and support his point (the scientist he misquoted even commented on the article comments!).
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astro...on_sunday.html