View Single Post
Old 09-15-2013, 11:10 PM   #52
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by playmaker View Post
...Correct me if I'm wrong but the Flames have to choose from the following options:

1. Hope for the best and see one of our prospects (Wotherspoon, Roy, Ramage ?) sky-rocket to the elite level.

2. Draft D heavy next year, even when highly skilled forwards are available...
It has already been said a few times, but I thought it best to be direct in my response to your post.

You're wrong. This is not the only option—nor is it even a good option that the Flames should consider. Teams should only very rarely draft by position to fill weaknesses in their prospect pool, and it should NEVER become a full-scale draft philosophy that replaces picking the best player available. A team like the Flames simply cannot afford to let highly skilled players pass because of a perceived need, especially since there are quite a number of highly pronounced needs to begin with.

A much better option—in my opinion, the very best option available—is for this team to simply keep doing what it is currently doing: their due diligence in scouting and drafting, and picking the best player available each year with little or no regard for his position played.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post: