Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
You can't compare h2h unless the two players are the same age. Ever. It's stupid.
Federer is the greatest because of the sheer dominance he displayed at his peak.
|
First off, I'm no Nadal fan - never really became a fan of either, actually. But their being different ages doesn't mean you can't compare them. It just means you have to be wary of context. But 10-21, given their age differences, means two things: First, that Federer couldn't beat Nadal when he was at his peak, and that Federer couldn't beat Nadal when Nadal was at his peak.
And Inglewood Jack - two thirds of their meetings were in Finals, so I'm not sure what you are getting at