View Single Post
Old 09-12-2013, 01:56 PM   #159
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
No, it wouldn't be binding not in a legal sense. But it would behoove any team to be a promise keeper... wouldn't want to get the rep of a franchise that reneges on promises as it would make signing future NCAA free agents (or free agents in general) more difficult. I don't see it as being against any mantra to give someone a spot initially... I'm pretty sure no team would commit to keeping a guy up no matter what but guarenteeing a 10game intial trial in a rebuilding year? Sure, I'd do that if it means the difference between getting a guy I really want to put pen to paper.
The big promise would be for an opportunity to win a spot.

10 6-8 minute games playing with Jackman and McGratton is different than playing 5 16 minute games between Glencross and David Jones.

If McKnight gets 5 games on the second line (counting exhibition games) and sucks then he or any other NCAA player can't complain that he didn't get a good look.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote