Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt
I wasnt aware the term butthurt was relevant anymore, but no I'm just fine.
I didn't blame injuries for anything. Everyone has them, however there is likely no team in the league that can continue on after losing their quarterback. So no, I'd like to say injury. Not plural. And the results aren't too difficult to back that up, with the Bears or the Packers, or the rest of the NFL really. Also, I apologize, being ranked at #31 in sacks allowed is technically not the worst offensive line. I just figured since they couldn't run the ball either that i'd stick them down there
Chicago is at worst the #2 team in the NFC North and I really dont think Green Bay is that far ahead of them or the Lions. I think Chicago wins the division this year barring a Cutler injury
|
And i think the Bears finish 3rd in the division.
Didnt blame injuries? You were playing the "if fishes were wishes" game when saying they would have won the division 2 years ago.
Yes GB gave up way to many sacks last year...of course when you have no running game that will happen a lot. Mind you Chicago wasnt much better than GB in this regard giving up 44 and DID have a running game that saved Cutler from throwing even more picks. Trying to say that the Bears Oline is somehow superior to GB is laughable.
Here is all that matters in that regard though..
GB 40 TDs passing 8 INT's 51 sacks against
Chi 21 TD's passing 16 INT's 44 sacks against