View Single Post
Old 09-06-2013, 03:54 PM   #592
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
So, mostly irrelevant question, but: Would you trade Monahan and the #2 overall pick next year (assuming we suck the way everyone expects) for Kessel?
Apples and oranges. There was no way of knowing that the future 1st rounders would both be so high. I think Burke was expecting Kessel would help make them a playoff team therefore making those picks in the late teens. Also, Kessel at that time was a 21 year old budding superstar (depending on who you talk to). A slightly more comparable scenario would be if we would trade 2 future first rounders (and a 3rd) for someone like Landeskog. But it's still not a perfect comparison because even if that trade did happen, I don't think anyone would think having Landeskog would put us in the playoffs and make the traded picks in the high teens range. We would likely have top 5 picks for the next couple years with or without him, so no, I wouldn't give up those 2 picks for Landeskog. Hindsight is always 20/20, but if you look at the trade the day it happened with all the surrounding variables at the time it wasn't a bad idea. This trade is now 4 years old and has been debated to death, maybe it's time to let it die and look forward to the positives Burke will bring to the Flames.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is offline   Reply With Quote