Quote:
Originally Posted by Pointman
Yes, all three are violations of your rights. This is why I, being ateist, will not tell your children that there's no god, even though there's a lot of scientific evidence to it and I consider religious beliefs rural and backwards.
|
Mind sharing with us any of this scientific evidence? Never seen it before.
Quote:
|
I still haven't described it because it is irrelevant.
|
If the harm to children is irrelevant what is the point of the law in the first place? If it is irrelevant than there should be no laws and no issues with any gay 'propaganda'.
Quote:
|
It is not equivalent. You couldn't understand why parents don't want to talk about being gay when kids are around.
|
Why? I have children. What is so different in Russia that leads someone outside of the country the inability to understand. Honestly, what is the difference?
Quote:
|
Here, second paragraph from the bottom. Authorities say, that "non-traditional relationships" are the ones that can not produce children.
|
I've never thought of my grandparents' marriage as 'non-traditional'. Quite the opposite, actually. IMO the inability to produce children seems like a huge cop out. Kinda like 'We can't think of a great reason, so let's go with they can't have kids'. It's weak, and it opens up a massive can of worms.
Quote:
|
Even if this law had a definition that you would consider perfect, you would still be against it, right?
|
Perfect for me would be equality. So, if there is inequality I would still be against it. What would be a 'perfect' definition in your opinion?
Quote:
|
Everyone is equal under this law.
|
Well, unless you're gay.
Quote:
|
This law punishes activity, not being or not being gay.
|
This sounds a lot like the Mormon chuch...........it's okay if you're gay, just don't do anything about it. See? We're not bigots.