Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen
I certainly didn't mean to imply that people are 'stupid' for having different ranking criteria than I do. Your reasoning all makes sense. I'm just in the camp of 'potential' greatly trumping 'chance of reaching potential' in a prospect ranking exercise.
|
That's fair (and a better way to say it)
As Bingo mentioned, this really all comes down to the weighting we each pout on the two major variables, potential, and readiness.
For me, potential is the more important, but I need to see some progress as well. Like I said with Poirier, we have a snapshot that he was worthy of being picked 22nd overall. Now I want to see him move forward this year, and if he does, then he is going to move way up in my rankings.
But there are no right answers and I certainly respect that others weight these things differently.