Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
"useless Bouwmeester hate" ---- the signing of Wideman was thinking ahead with the plan/knowledge that Bouwmeeester was going to be dumped.
If Bouwmeester was a functional top pairing D-man the signing of Wideman to replace Hannan would not have been a priority.
I really like the Bouwmeester high-light package---- especially his great play in the Flames playoff runs.
You know that Bouwmeester was really bad when Hudler and Stempniak and even Pardy have enough good plays to put together a highlight package...... Haven't seen one from Bouwmeesters 279 games as Flame.
|
The signing of Wideman was we have a ton of money and the stupid idea that we can be competitive so lets sign this defensive liabilty that can score points if allowed to stay on PP for 2 minutes. The only way he is a replacement for Bouwmeester is as a player to fill out the roster on the ice he does nothing to replace him.
I didn't realize that we are judging players by highlight reels but I love the highlight reel of Chris Dingman carrying the Cup around the ice twice with that loser Iginla and bum Dionne never doing it once. Guess it is clear that Dingman is the much better player than those two losers.