Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
And of the course the false and useless Bouwmeester hate thrown in for no reason.
Wideman a better option? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
|
"useless Bouwmeester hate" ---- the signing of Wideman was thinking ahead with the plan/knowledge that Bouwmeeester was going to be dumped.
If Bouwmeester was a functional top pairing D-man the signing of Wideman to replace Hannan would not have been a priority.
I really like the Bouwmeester high-light package---- especially his great play in the Flames playoff runs.
You know that Bouwmeester was really bad when Hudler and Stempniak and even Pardy have enough good plays to put together a highlight package...... Haven't seen one from Bouwmeesters 279 games as Flame.