Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Why would he let them look at it first without a signed agreement.
As for the rest, where was I attacking the messenger. Oh yeah because I'm spectacle about the word of a criminal.
where do you get that the cops are beholden to Ford from btw, considering that they raided the house that the video was supposedly at and let the press know that they were doing it.
|
From the story the police seem to agree that the video exists. It's just a matter of if the quality is good enough to prove it is Ford in the video. If Siad has the video, I don't see any reason for him not to provide it under an agreement that if it shows Ford smoking crack, he'll get his deal. At least that is how it goes on TV shows. The accused has to back up his story or the deal falls through. What I can see is that the Crown and the police aren't that interested in what Ford did.
Yeah sure, the mayor doesn't have any influence with his police department? Even if it is shown to be Ford in the video, I don't see there being any criminal charges being brought against him, so the police would be happy to sweep it under the rug.
Don't forget it isn't only the criminal's word that says the video exists and even the prosecution says it exists so attacking him, isn't germane. Lets just see the video.
Quote:
|
Citing sources, the newspaper said Siad tried to get a plea deal by offering to give the video to prosecutors, which they reportedly rejected because they wouldn’t be able to confirm it was Ford smoking crack in the video.
|