Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
What's wrong with you? Are you so incapable of crafting an argument that you have to resort to complete fabrication? You've not only made up a completely ridiculous "procedure" you've done it as part of an argument that you started by saying that he met the legal standard, one you don't even know.
|
The 'procedure' I gave there was quite obviously an attempt to irritate you. I think the problem with these kinds of situations is that they really can't develop any kind of all encompassing procedure that covers everything because there's so many fine variables. That must be why the investigations take so long.
As a result, as of now, t's just as nonsensical to say he was justified as it is to say he wasn't justified.