Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
No, it's totally objective, which is why I put the word in there. You pay basically nothing for a lake (we pay ~$250 annually at Lake Bonavista) and it gives you an insane amount of leisure opportunities that people in a non-lake community don't have. Having those opportunities is objectively better than not having those opportunities.
|
No, wrong.
For it to be an objective property it would have to be beneficial for all. However, in the case of lakes it is not as such. You may find the lake to be a wonderful place to enjoy a weekend, where as your neighbor could give 2-rats for it. Hence having a lake is a completely subjective value.