Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
No, it's totally objective, which is why I put the word in there. You pay basically nothing for a lake (we pay ~$250 annually at Lake Bonavista) and it gives you an insane amount of leisure opportunities that people in a non-lake community don't have. Having those opportunities is objectively better than not having those opportunities.
|
My parents just left lake Bonavista last week after 42 years, and moved into a home in Cranston on the ridge of Fish Creek park. They haven't used the lake in 10 years, and have walked their dogs in Fish Creek park every day since they have been in Cranston. Objectively, they get more use out of their new location than their old one. WHY ISN'T CRANSTON NUMBER ONE ON TEH LIST?1!!!!!!!!!111!!111