Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
No, it's totally objective, which is why I put the word in there. You pay basically nothing for a lake (we pay ~$250 annually at Lake Bonavista) and it gives you an insane amount of leisure opportunities that people in a non-lake community don't have. Having those opportunities is objectively better than not having those opportunities.
|
Of course you assume everyone values the exact same things which of course is 100% incorrect, so nice try there. Funny thing though, a lot of people value communties with, say, an offleash dog park, whereas you value a community where dogs are banned. The fact you like a lake doesn't mean everyone does.