Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Well on one hand we have to listen to people like you on one side of the extreme and then the people on the other side of the extreme tell us all how uneducated we are when it's nearly impossible to find an unbiased source from which to educate ourselves. The information is all skewed depending on where it originated.
|
You live your whole life utterly dependent on science. You are a baby in the wilderness without it. You trust it to deliver clean water from hundreds of miles away, you trust it to fly 30 000 feet in the air at 600kph land ITSELF based on satelites orbiting the earth, and yet, on this specific aspect of weather related science (which, if you pay any attention at all to the weatherman, you area already on board with climate science), you choose to not accept it, citing some 'i don't know what it all means' reasoning?
You just choose to not accept this one part of it?
This is like not believing in dinosaurs. This is the level we're at here. The comparison to flat-earthers is so apt most people gloss over it because of how deeply insulting it is to be on that flat-earth side. This is 'let's wait for more evidence' that tobacco causes cancer argument.
I mean, seriously, we're sending robots out of the solar system, but guys who study climate change are a bunch of politically motivated jerks out to screw the economy for their own personal gain, and, not only that, the conspiracy is so large, essentially the entire scientific community --responsible for the previously mentioned marvels of technology and who rely on much of this data for their own scientific endeavors -- is on board with it.
I'm with Tinordi on this one. These opinions should be seen as outrageous, like a creationism museum. It's stunting our growth as a society.