Quote:
Originally Posted by Regorium
The fact that there was marijuana in his system when he died from the autopsy doesn't change that eh. He might not have been high, but there were absolutely drugs in his system.
He's saying that if the situation was reversed, we (as in the people in this thread defending Zimmerman) would not be defending Trayvon, because Trayvon is black.
That's literally the argument. His vague post about "lol conclusions from reading this board" is thinly veiled.
I mean, if he knew my post history, he would know that I side with the law in every single instance. ie. In the reverse case, the law would find Trayvon innocent - and thus I would support Trayvon.
The fact that he considers that I would switch my stance based purely on the color of a person's skin, and not the overwhelming evidence in the case, is clearly accusing me of even considering race (ie. racist) in the first place.
|
Nope, sure doesn't. Trace amounts of marijuana in a persons system doesn't not mean they were high, it actually pretty conclusively says they weren't (that whole 'trace' part is kinda important).