Quote:
Originally Posted by JeanLucPicard
There is actually nothing wrong with them publishing his picture on the cover. The bias exists in our minds. Maybe we should read the article instead of act like sheep. Just because Rolling Stone normally has celebrities on their cover, doesn't mean that by publishing his picture on the cover, they're treating him like one.
|
Except the fact that half of these people do these sorts of crime for the infamy that follows. Simply feeding them when you put them on the cover of the Rolling Stone. If you can't act or sing but crave to be famous simply commit a heinous crime.
Just think about the victims that lost limbs or family that have to live with seeing the man that commited it on the cover of the Rolling Stone that is normally reserved for entertainment superstars. Disgusting.