Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
What in the fata are you even talking about? Receiving training does not require that someone become invincible, it simply alters what becomes reasonable, and it also lessens the chances that lethal force will be required. I must be losing it to think that perhaps people who are licensed to carry firearms should be trained, absolute crazy talk right there.
I also really enjoy that little fantasy scenario you constructed at the end there. What's your evidentiary basis for that? Oh what's that? Nothing at all. Just as I thought. We all have our theories, try not to present them as fact.
|
Valo, your posts have gone seriously downhill the last month or so, you actually appear to be trolling this thread. You are now asking me for my evidentiary basis for my info? Do you realize the case has taken place and Zimmerman was innocent? The first prosecutor assigned the case declined, because that person agreed with the police that Zimmerman was telling the truth and there was no evidence to the contrary.
And by the way, Zimmerman used the gun for exactly what it was intended, to shoot a bullet. I am not sure what more training would have provided him.
I am actually expecting a full on online mental breakdown from you based on some of the stuff you typed up in this and some other threads the last few months.