Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
So the word of a guy who gets pinched for murder if his story doesn't paint him the right way? Yeah I'm not buying that. The truth likely lies somewhere between the two extremes, which is usually the case.
|
That's not the same as "nothing at all." The trial presented more than "nothing" to suggest that Martin could have been the attacker. Including not only the defendants account, but evidence like the injuries and the 911 call where he said he would stop and you hear him stop. Is that enough evidence to say for sure? Absolutely not. But to say nothing at all is teetering to the point of arguing for arguing sake. Which is too bad because you bring up solid points in a lot of your posts and then go and say things like there was no evidence Martin attacked him first....