Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Most gun offences do not involve legally licenced guns. The case of a legally licensed gun being involved in a killing is the exception, not the rule.
If you promote stiffer gun laws, you are affectign socio-economically disadvantaged classes far more than the people you are arguing should be protected.
And yes, you are arguing against his defence. Your arguing that he should have to prove his defence on a higher burden, IE it should be less available.
Once again, what you're talking about would result in an all out assault on working class and ghetto-ised Americans, who make up the vast majority of violent crime and gun offences in America. No different than the "war on drugs".
|
Possibly the dumbest thing I've read all week.
Gun laws that are aimed at removing one of the leading causes of death for inner city youth are an all out assault on the working class. What a joke.
And sorry, if you want to carry a gun you should have additional burdens placed upon you.