Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan
Yeah, it's called 2 separate points,
|
Actually, it is called diversion. I have only brought up the investigation (which you called unprofessional) and you ignored my points completely and your response was to ask the following unrelated and unprovable question:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan
Let me ask you this, if Z was not out that night, armed, looking for people he was worried about, would TM been killed that night?
|
I don't mind answering, but please answer mine as well.
Is the question what would have happened if Z was unarmed? That only comes into play the moment Z reached for his weapon, which is somehow no longer there. TM would have continued beating him up. I doubt TM would have murdered Z, but I don't think that is a factor. All that matters at that point is Z was getting assaulted. With the gun Z is dead, without the gun we are unsure what happens.
If I change your question a bit to what happens if Z does not go out that night, then I think TM goes home.
I can also ask a simple question, what happens if TM does not attack Z and instead walks right into the house he was staying at? I think the police show up, TM explains what he was up to, and Z is satisfied he did his duty.
Now my last question: Do you still believe the investigation was unprofessional, and if so why?