Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov
I'm not sure I understand your hypothetical scenarios. For instance, in the first scenario, the intoxicated person commits a crime. In the second scenario, the intoxicated person is (I presume) the victim of a crime. I'm not sure I see the point you are drawing from this.
|
There wasn't really a point, per se. I was wondering aloud about the equivalency of the two scenarios and whether they would both be treated in the same way - that is, in both scenarios is the victim still the one that is inebriated and taken advantage of by somebody who was sober? More just questioning who in one scenario a drunk person is considered a victim, and in the other case is considered a criminal.