[To Be Quite Honest]

Originally Posted by WhiteTiger

It's stuff like this that makes me wonder why intoxication is a perfectly fine defense, but not an excuse. You say that when someone is drunk, there is a higher burden of reasonable steps to confirm consent...I don't know about you, but I've yet to meet any really drunk people who were capable of dealing with basic steps, much less higher steps. And, sadly, I deal with really drunk people on a far-too-frequent basis.

The whole "victim was too drunk to consent, but the accused who was just as drunk should have known better" thing really rankles at me, I guess. Really drunk people act and do really dumb things. I'd go so far as to say that NEITHER is capable of consenting...but there doesn't seem to be much luck in preventing drunk people from having sex.

On the light hearted side, maybe we need automatic chastity belts that engage after 2-3 beers...

The Cooch Controller and the C**K Blocker.