Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN
Are you not framing your "discussion" in absolutes? I think you are confused. I wasn't up in arms about things at all.
Making a seemingly absolute statement doesn't mean that one isn't up for discussion or debate. You can have passionate and heated debates without "arguing". An even if there is an "argument" going on, does it upset you that much? As long as it's not personal (i.e. comply with board rules) and you're still debating or arguing the points, what's the matter?
|
Nope, I'm not. It's a fifth round draft pick and I would have been fine with Feaster taking him off waivers too if he thought that was prudent or was what worked for him at the time. It's not really a big deal and I think we may as well agree to disagree.
It doesn't upset me at all. It is annoying however when for 5 pages people have laid out the POSSIBLE reason why Feaster and Co may have done what they did and you reply with "It was a waste of a pick" everytime. That's what I mean by absolutes. If you are not interested in possibly understanding the other side, just state after the 2nd page or so 'agree to disagree' and the discussion can evolve. That's just my opinion though.
I understand that's your opinion, and you're entitled to it obviously, and this will be the last I say on it, I just get tired of reading the same arguement over and over for pages.
And yes, I realize that's my problem an no I'm not new here.(before someone asks again
)