I just don't understand why goalies are held to a much higher standard than players at other positions.
In the last 30 years, 55 players have been inducted to the HHOF, and only 4 of them were goalies (Smith, Fuhr, Roy, and Belfour). If we used the same "he was never the best player at his position" criteria for non-goalies, any centre whose career coincided with Gretzky and Lemieux shouldn't be in the Hall either.
I also don't understand the whole "first ballot" debate. The players are retired. It's not like a guy can do something between years of retirement that somehow retroactively makes his career better. I can understand if it's a year where 5 or 6 players are eligible for the first time and only 4 can get in, but otherwise, if a guy is good enough to be in the Hall, he should be in the Hall.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|