Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
I feel good they quashed it. but wonder why Feaster would want to do this in the first place. Of course can't be too sure about what would have been given up, but dumping multiple assets of which we have very little would just have set us back more. It would be Seguin and not much else for 5 years. Then on top of that to put all your eggs in a risky boozey basket.
Maybe understandable if it was a rock solid young star but not one with huge question marks surrounding him.
Maybe Edwards/ownership is looking down the road instead of the next playoff for once.
|
My thoughts exactly. Why was Feaster doing this? That is more problematic than ownership meddling, especially when the owners are the ones with the sensible decision.
Can we please have the booze hound that requires additional staff to prevent him from sneaking out and acting like an idiot?
Thank lord we didn't get this guy.