Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
I always find it puzzling when some random people's opinions on a blog/fansite/etc somehow carry any more weight than any poster here or guy on the street. Because it is written in an article format, that means they have watched players play and have a scouting resume?
|
To be fair, people who can write long, readable articles on a topic in a consistent basis generally are more worth listening to in comparison to the people who can't. Just one of those things.
That said, there are topics which are inherently worthless, but apparently have to be written about. Like post-draft analysis the day after it happened.
I would love it if somebody took up the habit of doing a yearly post-draft analysis that looked at for example drafts from 2-4 years ago. That would actually be useful and provide some insight into teams drafting and development.