Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
Do you have a rebuttle to his asertion that the Nature piece is NOT a peer reviewed peice of liturature but instead just a journalistic piece.
|
Scroll to the top of the page where I described it as a news article designed to provoke scientific discussion. Not blogs. It's an opinion piece. You're aware that Nature allows responses to these news articles? Have you seen any?
I see you thanked his articles therefore I can only assume you agree with it. Do you have an opinion on his graph interpretation? Maybe you can share what sort of methodology he would use to come to the conclusion that the plants were first documented there, therefore by default they must have evolved there?