Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Why do you have to turn every thread into this discussion? We get it. You want the city limits to end at 17th avenue in the south and 16th avenue in the north. I, for one, can't wait until the day you buy a property and its in the suburbs!
|
I will mention it when it's relevent to the dicussion. That happens a lot because it's relevent to a lot of Calgary issues. It would be downright silly to get rid of the floodplain subsidy without accounting for the suburban subsidy. Furthermore, if you understand why we shouldn't have a floodplain subsidy, then you should easily be able to understand why we shouldn't have a suburban subsidy either.
And your representation of my position is far from accurate (not even a hyperbole, just wrong). I've always said that I don't want to impose arbitrary limits on where people can live... I just want them to pay for their lifestyle choices.
Small tip, if you don't want to talk about the sprawl subsidy, then just ignore (or report) the post. If you reply to me, I'll be inclined to reply to you.