Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
Better yet, try to get a definition of "hockey IQ". It's a whole bunch of subjective crap arbitrarily out into statistics. Think figure skating scores
|
Distinction: There is 'hockey IQ', and there is 'Ice Q', which is TSN's term.
'Hockey IQ' is kind of the opposite of errors in baseball. With a good video database like PUCKS, you should (in theory) be able to see what percentage of the time a puck-carrier fails to make an available play, and what percentage a defending player gives up a scoring chance by making a bad move. You could get a reasonably valid statistic out of that. I don't think anybody has ever actually done it, but it could be done in principle.
'Ice Q', on the other hand, is a dessert product from Dairy Queen that never made it out of test marketing.