Quote:
Originally Posted by wingmaker
The cap hit is fine. Of course it is — that's how the deal was structured. That isn't the problem. There were many MANY people who thought this was a bad deal from the start. Saying that it is a casualty of the new CBA is revisionist history. From the moment the ink was dry on that deal people wondered how long it would be before the Canucks wanted out from under it. Granted, this date came much sooner than expected. But I fully remember people thinking that it might be better for the Canucks if the league overturned the Luongo contract. This outcome was extremely predictable.
|
oh ya there were definitely people who disagreed with it, I just remember the pro vastly outweighing the cons