Quote:
Originally Posted by SeoulFire
Go back and read through the comments and then argue that most weren't overreactions.
Your 'analysis' pointed out the obvious while ignoring the other side of the issue—most of the people whinging about the picks have done nothing to earn respect.
Succinct is all that is needed when you offer nothing of substance.
|
Certainly, some of the posts were over reactions. However, the point was raised in response to your assertion that "you never criticized" other posters. Again. Incorrect.
Back to point, RE: Feaster, the expectation of some is that he should not be criticized, whereas I believe that respect should be earned by a GM by actual moves or decisions. And what, pray tell, is this metric for respect that posters require before they are allowed to level criticism at the Flames organization?
And what substance have you offered? The notion that people should not criticize decisions if they are somehow not imbued with what you deem to be worthy of respect?
And exactly who are you to critique others?