Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT
I think it's pretty obvious that if you appoint a high court to interpret existing constitutional law, you should likely follow their rulings.
If you have a better system for law interpretation that doesn't involve plebiscite voting on high court rulings, I'd like to hear it.
|
I don't believe he's suggesting that the Court should do anything but interpret and apply constitutional law, but the fact that this was a close decision shows that it's not exactly obvious that the Court applied it in accordance with everyone's views on how that should be done. I can certainly see why some people would argue that the Court has stepped outside of interpretation and application and into righting what it perceives as a wrong on its own accord.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
Last edited by valo403; 06-27-2013 at 04:03 PM.
|