Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT
I think it's pretty obvious that if you appoint a high court to interpret existing constitutional law, you should likely follow their rulings.
If you have a better system for law interpretation that doesn't involve plebiscite voting on high court rulings, I'd like to hear it.
|
That sounds like an OK arrangement to me.
I am just saying your original wording about the govt over riding the people was wrong. If you were simply caught up in the moment and in fact meant that courts can interpret laws as you state above that is another matter which is of course more defendable.
Anyways, thats enough on that.