Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
Unfortunately (and whether you're sick of it or not), being Russian defines Nichushkin nearly as much as his skill set.
History shows that drafting high end Russians since the introduction of the KHL is extremely risky. If they turn out to be a project, they'll go to the KHL rather than earn an NHL roster spot by playing their way up from the minors. If they turn out to be a superstar, they'll be offered boatloads of cash each time their NHL contract comes up for expiry. And I don't blame them for leaving for either option.
Any time you're discussing Nichushkin, it's worth mentioning that he's Russian. Birthplace isn't nearly important though when discussing Swedes, Americans, Germans, Swiss, etc.
|
Back that up.
That is definitely the stereotype. There are definitely some examples. But it isn't true for the vast majority of Russians.
In 2012 three Russians were drafted in the first round: Yakupov (1), Grigorenko (12), Vasilevskiy (19). The first two are playing well on their respective teams. The latter had a great development year in the KHL and is likely coming to North America this season.
In 2011 Namestnikov was picked at 27 and is developing in the AHL.
In 2010 there were again three in the first round. Burmistrov (8) is playing in the NHL. Tarasenko (16) is a top prospect and made his way over last season. Kuznetsov (26) is one of Washington's top prospects.
2009 Kulikov is playing in the NHL. Etc
Yes, there is occasionally a Filatov or Radulov. There are also an occasional Erixon, Schultz, or Knight. That doesn't mean you never draft Swedes or College players.
The Flames have the opportunity to interview Nichushkin. If they think he is a flight risk, has poor work ethic, or an entitlement issue then they shouldn't draft him. But the whole 'Russian Factor' is stupidly overblown.