View Single Post
Old 06-25-2013, 01:54 PM   #189
Zarley
First Line Centre
 
Zarley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
Then he said, paraphrasing, that if the pipeline itself contributes to the increase in the GHG emissions by virtue of increased tar sands activity, then it should not be approved and that is the angle which will be used in evaluating its merits.
That is interesting.

Of course, the oil sands will be developed regardless of whether Keystone is built - it's just a matter of when. The increased emissions will occur at some point down the road regardless of whether this oil is going to the US or the Chinese or the Euros.

Good sign for approval I think.
Zarley is offline   Reply With Quote