Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
-----------------------------------
[5]Nadal v Darcis
Kubot v Andreev
Robert v Falla
Ungur v [25]Paire
[18]Isner v Donskoy
Andujar v Mannarino
Brown v Garcia-Lopez
Hewitt v [11]Wawrinka
[15]Almagro v Zopp
Matosevic v Rufin
Stepanek v Reid
Edmund v [24]Janowicz
[30]Fognini v Melzer
Reister v Rosol
Dutra Silva v Stakhovsky
Hanescu v [3]Federer
-----------------------------------
[6]Tsonga v Goffin
Roger-Vasselin v Gulbis
Verdasco v Malisse
Kamke v [31]Benneteau
[22]Monaco v Knittel
Lacko v Ram
De Schepper v Lorenzi
Baghdatis v [10]Cilic
[14]Tipsarevic v Troicki
Andrey Kuznetsov v Montanes
Gicquel v Pospisil
Haase v [20]Youzhny
[32]Robredo v Bogomolov Jr.
Mahut v Hajek
Ward v Lu
Becker v [2]Murray
A NADAL-FEDERER QUARTERFINAL!
|
this bottom half is all sorts of stupid. I know they used some sort of mathematical formula based on Nadal's last 12 months on grass (which of course means he had no chance for a bump up) but for Fed/Rafa/Andy to have to plow through 3 of the Big 4 to win is just ludicrous.
I just hope Nole doesn't screw up and get bounced early, leaving the final to be an even bigger debacle than the French was.