View Single Post
Old 06-18-2013, 08:11 PM   #301
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Edit: says here that NCAA doesn't need an age factor because most are out of their biggest developmental years by the time they reach the NHL. You disagree?
It also says that the NCAA doesn't need an age factor because NCAA players would lose their eligibility by opting into the draft, and therefore don't get drafted until age 21 or 22. This is a load of horse pucky. I would be mildly suspicious of the site's projections on NCAA players because of that.

On the other hand, NCAA players often don't come straight out of high school. A lot of them do what Jankowski planned, and spend some time in the USHL or a comparable league before they make the jump to college. I believe there are not many 18-year-olds playing hockey in the principal NCAA conferences. Physical maturity is much less of an issue than it is in junior.

So the site could be right about not needing an age adjustment for NCAA players, but not for the reason they gave.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post: