This thread has been quite enlightening and in an ironic way has succeeded in making its point although not exactly as intended.
I agree with the initial post of the thread that there is a lot of BS and lies spread by anti GMOers and a reluctance to let go of old beliefs.
But what has been clearly demonstrated here also is that the pro GM crowd are no different. Present the slightest bit of peer reviewed scientific evidence suggesting that all is not utopia, there are significant flaws in the technology and serious significant unforecast challenges to address regarding the sustainability of the whole thing and the hands go over the ears not unlike their counterparts.
Hell we even had a guest appearance from some fella from FB with a self confessed inability to read and interpret a simple graph who then proceeds to link a "blog" . And part of the original discussion and a recurring theme was junk science vs real science ..... right. Not to mention Saskatchewan seed patterns explaining US increased chemical use.
"What the human being is best at doing, is interpreting all new information so that their prior conclusions remain intact." - Warren Buffet.
My 2 questions remain. In the meantime some latest news.
http://www.farmers-exchange.net/deta...rticleID=12692
I eagerly await the bloggers publications in the peer reviewed journals.