Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
No, but you were the one arguing most vehemently and throwing around shots like 'I can see why you don't work there anymore' and 'its a fact that [I] don't know what I'm talking about.'
Glad to hear that he'll get his item covered, as he should.
|
First I apologize if I offended you.
Second, I am happy to hear that Puckluck2 has been looked after. Insurer's cover/pay claims for a number of reasons. The resolution of puckluck2 situation does not change that fact that this is incorrect:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canehdianman
Slava's point is that if puckluck2's car was hit by someone whom he has the insurance information for, it would be that individual's insurance that would be paying for the replacement of the $1000 machine.
|
The tortfeasor is not required to pay for the replacement of property damaged as a result of their negligence.