Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
They also have everything that a scumbag, dislaikable organization has:
D-bag players- CHECK
Overrated guys that get way too much love- CHECK
An unlikable whiner coach- CHECK
More luck than the average team- CHECK
Favorable reffing (in Pens series at least)- CHECK
Huge D-bag owner- CHECK
Obnoxious media hacks pumping them up local and national- CHECK
The biggest d-bag fans in their sport (I say they have passed Canuck fans this year)- CHECK
I honestly can't think of a reason outside of being a fan of them pre-Flames days to like this team. They are as unlikeable as any team out there and their fans (especially on CP lately) push it over the edge.
I would say LA is more complete. Better skill, much tougher and better goaltending.
And more complete or not Chicago should walk all over them if they play.
|
Lol you are really something. Always the same thing with you. REFS, LUCKY BOUNCES.....etc etc etc.......same excuses different channel.
And Boston >> Pittsburgh. 11-2 goals in the series. Luck? They outscored Pittsburgh 9-1 on Pittsburgh's ice.
Pittsburgh is losing the series 3-0 because Boston dominated games 1 and 2 and Crosby/Malkin have done absolutely nothing. Malkin at least created chances in game 3.
I love how every team you don't love are dbags. You think 2/3 of the team's in the leagues are dbags and the excuses always keep coming. Refs, luck/lucky bounces etc. Typical moon. Boston is a better team then Pittsburgh is, it's pretty simple really. Boston's best players (Krejci, Bergeron, Chara) have shown up to play where Pittsburgh's best are lost. Crosby has looked like a bottom 6 forward this series and that is unacceptable because he is the best forward in the league.
People would actually take you seriously for once if you just said the truth once in awhile aka Boston is a good team and not just a bunch of lucky guys who aren't good and only are 1 win away from the finals because of refs and luck.