Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar
Neither the article, nor the Principal's letter says anything about who was suspended or why, other than, it was clear the intervenor was not suspended, where you stated it was a "fact" he was.
|
How is this stating anything as fact? I clearly say that I doubt they suspended the kid in a headlock which means I am not presenting it as fact at all. If I said it was a fact why include the doubt part explaining my reasoning for why I thought the kid was suspended?
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
The article said his locker was searched and the letter says two students were suspended. I doubt the kid in a headlock and had a knife pulled on him was suspended but considering the kid who jumped in to stop bullying was suspended who knows what the morons at that school did.
|
Quote:
|
You have a tendency to overstate opinions of all kinds of things as facts. This was just an easy to prove example; in your sports-related comments the evidence is harder to put together in one place. I think you tend to post opinions as fact, often without thinking or verifying, and my opinion is it hurts this board as a whole.
|
This really has nothing to do with the thread and is not based in fact at all. Considering your incorrect whining about facts in the post it is pretty funny though. I would say posting crap about posters that has nothing to do with them hurts the board much more than any made up BS you have about me.