Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
I agree completely. Maybe in part because I know dogs and dog behaviour pretty well (I have also lived with dogs for my entire adult life) I can see through this for what it is: a ploy on the part of the owner to get a chance for HIM to drop the puck at a Bruins game. Ray Charles's life will in no way be "enriched" through this event, and it would present virtually no difference to the dog's happiness and well being than were he to not do this. This really is stupid.
|
There would be virtually no difference to my happiness and well being if I didn't get to drop a piece of vulcanized rubber in the middle of a rink.
How come many hockey legends and celebrities got to drop the puck? To gain a surge of lifelong happiness?