[sureLoss]

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=6...site-Draft2013

"I think the upper parts of this draft are really strong," Weisbrod told NHL.com. "It's tough to compare [drafts] year to year, but some are deeper than others in terms of some really good players available in the fifth, sixth or seventh rounds -- I would sort of describe this year's draft as similar to that.

"I think it's a really strong draft all the way into the third round. So from our standpoint, it makes me excited about having three picks in the first round because there are a lot of high-potential players in this pool."

...

Weisbrod said he believes the strength of this year's draft might be at forward.

"You obviously have the premier players at every position," Weisbrod said. "Seth Jones is a horse on the back end, and as far as goaltending goes, Zach Fucale is really strong. But I believe the strongest position is probably up front, particularly down the middle, with some really good centers all throughout the top of the draft.

"I don't think about it too much from a positional standpoint though, but just from an aptitude and talent standpoint. I think it's pretty well spread out."

Flames general manager Jay Feaster might be open to any draft-day scenario, which includes possibly trading his first-round choices for additional assets.

"But we like the way things sit right now," Weisbrod said. "We like the idea of picking three times, but we've got a lot of things to address with our team.

"We're in a little bit of a retooling mode after some of the trades that got us picks, and we have holes in the lineup, so there's going to be a lot of constructive discussion between now and the draft about potential trades for actual players or moving picks around. I think it's certainly a possibility for us that our draft number and picks might not look the same on the day of the draft as they do today, but those are things we'll dig in on between now and then."

....

"I try and look at things more big picture rather than immediate need, but certainly when you get later in the first round and then to the other rounds at the very top, I guess you're more justified in drafting for need because you have four or five guys that could conceivably jump in and play right away," he said. "Then it's sort of a tie-goes-to-the-runner mentality. All things considered equal, you might as well draft at a position in which you have need."

Weisbrod is quick to point out that thinking might come back to haunt a franchise for years.

"Once you get to the later rounds, drafting out of need becomes dangerous because you're talking about longer-term development projects and the immediate needs of your team from what the needs are going to be in two to three years," Weisbrod said.