Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Having two Star reporters and a Gawker reporter both of who can massively profit from dragging this on doesn't fill me with certainty.
Sorry.
|
I don't think anyone is certain, but again I am pointing out that ignoring the fact the Gawker broke it, a news outlet with no known bone to pick with Ford, and instead focusing on the Star is a disservice to how news content is delivered nowadays.
Gawker is more believable because they have no prior history against Ford or his administration, and discounting them because they don't print their version of the news (hey where did you read the Star report, I bet it was online) is archaic.